We are living in a world where capitalism is destroying our environment and the way of living of many people who are not privileged enough to combat the system. Still, Forbes has to do its job and show us how wealth inequality is spiraling out of control with half of the world’s wealth now in hands of 1% of world’s population, but wait… why the Rothschilds and Rockefellers are not in the magazine? Where here is the truth…
“Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws. “
This a really shocking statement, but would you believe us when we tell you that it’s a House of Rothschilds maxim? The history of their moto goes back to 19th century and the person who said it first was Mater Amschel Rothschild, a banker who is said to be responsible for the highly corrupt banking and political system we have nowadays.
No one can be certain of how much money do the Rockefellers or the Rothschild have but if they are powerful enough to affect the global economy and promote wealth inequality, why doesn’t Forbes make a report about their net worth?
In January 2014, Oxfam announced that the richest 85 people on the planet share a combined wealth of $110 trillion. The figure was based on Forbes’s rich list 2013, and it equates to 65 times the total wealth of the entire bottom half (3.5 billion) of the world’s population.
Some people said that this was something ”good” since more people are getting richer and richer, but it’s really disgusting that these ”commentators” don’t realize that half of the world’s population is becoming poorer and no one is doing anything to tackle global wealth inequality.
Winnie Byanyima also said that the problem is not that there are rich people is that the explosion in inequality is holding back the fight against global poverty, promoting misery and inequality around the world. In other words, if we do not do something to change this, the system could get worse, since it goes behind closed doors and there is no citizen involvement.
In a paper called Wealth: Having it all and wanting more, Oxfam outlined how the richest 1 percent have seen their share of global wealth increase from 44% in 2009 to 48% in 2014, and will likely surpass 50% in 2016.
In other words, billionaires are not really increasing in our world but their collective net worth is. Do you still think that this is good? Isn’t scaring you to think that only 1% of world’s population could own more than the rest of us combined? That’s why Forbes doesn’t want you to know how rich the members of these families are because it will expose their globalist agenda.
Who are they?
If you are wondering who are the people who belong to this small percentage of billionaires, here is Forbes’ list. It’s really frightening to think that 66 people own more than seven billion people on our planet, do you think of what could happen if they keep getting richer?
Something really interesting about the list is that is mainly composed by CEOs of large corporations, oil and gas tycoons and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs (Michael Zuckerberg could not be absent here).
Still, after scrolling down for a little bit you start to notice that something is off here, where are the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers? They are the only trillionaires in the world, so of course, they should be there, what about the world’s Royal families? Are they not rich enough? Moreover, people that work in politics, entertainment and science are also missing, so it’s just natural to think that this list is not accurate at all.
What are they hiding?
A politician doesn’t like the media, especially when they are corrupt and oppressive, that’s why they work in absolute secrecy to avoid any kind of attention unless they want to promote a positive image of themselves.
Well, the truth is that Forbes has a strict policy that excluded heads of state from the rich list, that’s why the Queen of England and even some dictators are absent. Also, it’s really difficult to have a clear picture of how much money does the Queen make per day: her shareholdings remain hidden behind Bank of England Nominee accounts.
As the Guardian newspaper reported in May 2002: ‘The reason for the wild variations in valuations of her private wealth can be pinned on the secrecy over her portfolio of share investments…Her subjects have no way of knowing through a public register of interests where she, as their head of state, chooses to invest her money. Unlike [British politicians and Lords], the Queen does not have to annually declare her interests and as a result, her subjects cannot question her or know about potential conflicts of interests…’
That’s why the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds don’t appear on the list since many people said that they have set up and owned the Federal Reserve. It makes sense if you consider how these families can manipulate many global affairs nowadays (they have been doing it for years), could this be why they are untouchable for Forbes?
John D. Rockefeller said: ”The only problem with wealth is, what do you do with it?’‘ As you can see, they have money and are not afraid to brag about it, but how much? They are trillionaires of course, but where does this data come from?
Well, retired management consultant Gaylon Ross Sr, author of Who’s Who of the Global Elite, was apparently told in 1998 that the combined wealth of the Rockefeller family was approx. $11 trillion and the Rothschilds $100 trillion. Do you realize how powerful they are? It’s difficult to imagine how much money they have after almost 20 years, don’t you think?
Russo’s Rockefeller revelations and The Silenced Ones
Russo was a film-maker and activist who died in 2007, he came to prominence after directing ”From Freedom to Fascism”. Russo also claimed that Nick Rockefeller told him about ‘an event that would allow us to invade Afghanistan and Iraq’ eleven months before 9/11, and foretold the fact that the ‘War on Terror’ would be a hoax wherein soldiers would be looking in caves for non-existent enemies. Russo said in an interview that Rockefeller was planning many awful things for the world (wars, slavery, terrorism, etc.) and that he wanted him to be part of that project, claiming that he would be a powerful asset to their empire if he could join the Council for Foreign Relations (CFR).
Having worked all his life for people who care about freedom, he told Rockefeller that he couldn’t possibly do something like that and that his plans were nefarious: “As much as I like you, Nick, I don’t believe in enslaving people. We’re on opposite sides of the fence,” Russo told Nick. To which Rockefeller apparently replied: “Why do you care about those people? Take care of your own life; do the best you can for you and your family.” Russo concludes: “There was just a lack of caring; it was just cold.”
Of course, there is no way to verify these claims considering that there is no actual proof about it. Still, right before Russo died in August 2007, he recorded a beautiful message for the American people, saying that is really important that they resist to national ID cards and microchips, so the fight for individual freedom would never be over.
Besides Russo, other people have tried to ‘out’ the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers but have been silenced with no mercy, a big example of this was Ashely Mote, an ex-member of the European Parliament serving British Independence Party (UKIP). Mote asked a single question that marked him destiny forever:
“Mr. President, I wish to draw your attention to the Global Security Fund, set up in the early 1990s under the auspices of Jacob Rothschild. This is a Brussels-based fund and it is no ordinary fund: it does not trade, it is not listed and it has a totally different purpose. It is being used for geopolitical engineering purposes, apparently under the guidance of the intelligence services. I have previously asked about the alleged involvement of the European Union’s own intelligence resources in the management of slush funds in offshore accounts, and I still await a reply. To that question I now add another: what are the European Union’s connections to the Global Security Fund and what relationship does it have with European Union institutions?”
If you try to look it from the outside you would think that is just a normal question, right? Because if you are a true politician you should seek for the truth and the publican is looking for answers. Yet not only that Mote did not receive an answer, she was prosecuted.
She was sacked from his own party and later arrested for allegedly claiming false expenses during his time as an MEP. Mote said that he was a victim of a ”witch hunt’ for being anti-Europe and said the money he claimed was used to pay third-party whistleblowers in a quest to uncover corruption and fight for democracy and transparency in European politics, but like any other honest politician, he was incarcerated for trying to uncover the truth.